Venetian Opera Documentation

Documentation for https://venop.ccarh.org

Venetian opera is celebrated for many reasons. This collection of tabular information was inspired by the most mundane of them. The sheer bulk of operas (889) performed in Venice between 1660 and 1760 cried out for a comprehensive resource to untangle the countless threads of activity that existed within and between them. It turns out, though, that the fundamental tool for untangling many aspects of this complex artform is a detailed, day-by-day chronology. Every record shown here has a finite date of opening that is verified in weekly accounts. Access enables users to order events that may interest them--by composer, librettist, theater, and much else.

Quick start: Search on fields of your choice (horizontal search). Limit your search by a span of years (vertical limits). For exploring specific questions, less data bring sharper focus to answers.

Version 1 contains basic fields. Later version will include additional fields involving more specialized information.

Venetian culture of times past followed many prescribed rules, but which one was operative at any specific time might be open to question. The regularity that databases require for smooth operation requires supression of irregular spellings.

How to use this resource

Although it is possible to generate plots and tables for substantial periods of time, much of the power of this assembly of data comes from its richness to a focus on a specific topic--a composer, a librettist, a theater, a genre, a trail of musical sources. The difference is one of dimensions. A flat list of all the works at one theater, for example, can be immensely valuable. Yet a more nuanced view can be had by viewing, in a hypothtical case, the mutual occurrences of a specific genre, season, and incidental pieces (balli, intermezzi). It is also possible to collect several fields related to one perspective by using the tabbed choices at the top of the home screen.

Perspective views of the data

The most revealing insights may come from viewing a few fields at a time. To facilitate some popular motives for search, we have selected clusters of fields related to musical elements of an opera, literary aspects of a work, patronage, and the complex variables that determined when any specific work was permitted to open. These complement the cluster of core fields.

The purpose of this resource

This resource was compiled over decades. It has many perfunctory uses. In my own work it differentiates between legacy "facts" (e.g. attributed authorship) in secondary sources and statements that are verified in weekly news-sheets, most of them unpublished. The biggest single area of conflict in imputed year of performance.

Why is dating Venetian operas a problem?

Venetian culture thrived on inspiration, expression, and imagination. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries Venice had eight different nomenclatures for identifying years and seasons. Because there were so many operas (889 in the century annotated here), small questions about topics like the sequence of works of a composer or theater or about competing between theaters can never be definitively answered. As many as 23% of the years given in opera bibliographies are incorrect.

The root of the problem lies in erratic information given in printed libretti, which number many multiples higher than the number of works. Opera played no direct role in the church of the church, but it was not specifically a civic product either. Libretti were caught in the draft between a church year that started on January 1 and a civic year that advanced on March 1 (the mors veneto). The details and intricacies of the many conflicts caused by the difference are spelled out on my Song and Season</i: Science, Culture, and Theatrical Time in Early Modern Venice (2007)>.

This database is closely connected to three of my published books.

• Pallade Veneta: Writings on Music in Venetian Society, Venice: Fondazione Ugo e Olga Levi, 1985.

The monthly print Pallade veneta often shows the seams of weekly news reports. After 17 issues (from January 1687 through May 1688), it ceased publication. However, it continued in manuscript circulation. Most weekly issues are lost, but some surviving ones are from the year 1751.

The great virtue of weekly news-sheets in historical research is that they provide incontrovertible dates for events. These can be deduced from named weekdays (as in "Last Sunday the bones of Julius Caesar were resurrected in the Theater X"). Why are dates from these humble writings incontrovertible? In each locale from which they were issued, the dispatch was consistently made on a same day of the week. In Venice it was Saturday. The same date could not fall on Saturday in two consecutive years.

In a field such as opera history, otherwise served by multiple loose chronologies depending on carelessly edited period prints and modern interpretations, conflicts between the supposed implications derived from concentrating on years and seasons arise often.

Two discoveries emerged from the fact that opera openings are mentioned ubiquitously in weekly news-sheets. One was that the idea of establishing a secure chronology was entirely feasible. The other was that while there are many series of weekly news-sheets from Venice (and several dozen other cities), not one of them is complete. The pursuit of a fixed timeline thus came to depend on tracking down more and more dispatched assembled, patchwork style, in collections of Notizie, Diari, and other forerunners of modern newspapers. Full source citations are given in the New Chronology. In all, I consulted sixteen weekly series for any part of the century at hand I could find.

In assembling my New Chronology of Venetian Opera, I gave a letter code for the source of each date, e.g. (A) for avvisi, (M) for Mercuri. Extensive archival citations are not useful: news-reports are ordered by week, and it is very easy to find the original once an exact date is in hand. (None of these series is digitized for online consultation.) To convey and resolve all the complexities of dating at practical, cultural, and arithmetic levels, I wrote the book Song and Season: Science, Culture, and Theatrical Time as a companion to the New Chronology.

I never aimed to compile such a sprawling mass of data when I started assembling a few details for the 1680s and 1690s. My hope in 1982 was to establishing the sequential order of performances. I supposed that the position of a few perennially undatable works would match up with random holes in this provisional sequence.

By a circuitous path I was able to explore many topics pertinent to Venetian opera, which was a cornucopia of microhistories of theaters, personnel, creators, musical sources and how they arrived at their current locations, and--at a general level--how much Europe and the motives for staging opera changed between 1660 and 1760. Whole genres came and went, and each change is reflected through changes in patronage patterns, choices of entr'actes, dramatic genres, and much else.